Posts Tagged ‘political’

Limbaugh Compares Democrats To Nazis

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

Watch more at http://www.theyoungturks.com

Duration : 0:9:58

(more…)

How You Can Turn Democrats into Good Guys

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

Watch more at http://www.theyoungturks.com

Duration : 0:9:39

(more…)

Bill Maher: Democrats Are the New Republicans

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

Watch more at http://www.theyoungturks.com.

Duration : 0:7:38

(more…)

Catholics Voting Pro-Choice Are Excommunicated Automatically / Pro-Life Anti-Abortion Video PSA

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

From the “Catechism of the Catholic Church”, “2272 Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life. “A person who procures a completed abortion incurs excommunication latae sententiae,” “by the very commission of the offense,” and subject to the conditions provided by Canon Law. The Church does not thereby intend to restrict the scope of mercy. Rather, she makes clear the gravity of the crime committed, the irreparable harm done to the innocent who is put to death, as well as to the parents and the whole of society.” If I vote for a pro-abortion candidate (pro-choice), and that candidate supports legislation to legalize abortion, then I have formally co-operated in making it possible for babies to be murdered. If fact, section 2272 above says that a person who does so is automatically excommunicated!! Roman Catholics must vote for a Pro-life President, not Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, since the Church teaches that formal cooperation (voting for pro-abortion candidates) in an abortion is an grave offense. Film from rosaryfilms, Secret of the Rosary Films.

Keywords: Born Alive Infant Protection Act registered catholic voters Why Roman Catholics Cannot Vote For Obama Pro-Life Anti-Abortion Video Planned Parenthood Action Fund Barack Obama FREEDOM OF CHOICE ACT FOCA Freedom of Choice Act state law limits abortion nationwide allowing abortion-on-demand nine months pregnancy reason restrictions legal work research educational successes invalidate major types pro-life laws upheld Supreme Court Supreme Court decades Roe versus Wade types laws Freedom Choice Act invalidate national ban partial-birth abortion Supreme Court upheld Gonzales versus Carhart The Hyde Amendment prohibits federal funding abortion laws states restrict state funding abortion Laws effect jurisdictions bar abortions government operated hospitals laws requiring parental notification consent judicial authorization abortion performed minor daughter laws requiring girls women seeking abortion receive certain information matters campaign no we cannot video the first thing I’d do as President is to sign the Freedom of Choice Act fetal development alternatives abortion specified period abortion actually performed conscience matters laws allowing doctors nurses state licensed professionals hospitals health care providers decline provide pay abortions addition provision Freedom of Choice Act prohibits government agency official action discriminate exercise rights created Freedom of Choice Act respect benefits facilities services information government officials open lawsuits discriminates abortion sweeping mandate cover rural health clinics health education programs public schools pro-life speeches public officials perspective abortion social issue Catholic Church possibility just circumstances possible effectively defending human lives against unjustaggressor abortion official position Pope John Paul Second revisiting Pope Paul sixth historic encyclical Humanae Vitae Pope John Paul Depriving innocent tradition unchanged human being life undeniably begins conception always morally evil unchangeable yielding convenient compromises temptation self-deception papal murder section 2272 2273 formal cooperation offense canonical penalty person procure procures human life excommunication latae sententiae canon law mercy crime crimes death deaths innocent NARAL parents scandal society yes we can Barack Obama presidential election elections roman catholic catholics church freedom of choice act president vote abortion anti-abortion pro-life prolife pro-choice prochoice pro life anti planned parenthood pope Benedict xvi political 2008 voting votes voters abortions proportionality proportional politicians conscience catechism Jesus Christ Christian democrats republicans general john mccain bishops magisterium Humanae Vitae campaign NObama 08 moral responsibility christianity christians commentary analysis commercial bishop catechism ethics pro-abortion demand infanticide proportionate baby killer kill abortion-on-demand activists death penalty debate reproductive rights rape my body gay legislation race racism racist racists Hillary Clinton Keyes lies freedom hypocrisy bishop bishops preach teach practice infanticide yes we can II JPII VI black genocide African-American African-Americans African American holocaust nazi jews

Images from Fair Use.

Duration : 0:2:10

(more…)

Partial-Birth Abortion Procedure With Real Instruments - Pro-Life Anti-Abortion Video

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

Partial-Birth Abortion Procedure Using The Real Instruments. Excerpt of presentation by Dr. William Lile. More information on the video can be found at http://www.dyinglight.com. To reach Dr. Lile, go to http://www.prolifedoc.org. To order the DVD, visit http://www.dyinglight.com/store. The partial birth abortion is not a rare procedure. It is, essentially, a variant of the even more common and equally gruesome Dilation and Evacuation (D&E) procedure. There are in fact absolutely no obstetrical situations encountered in this country which require a partially delivered human fetus to be destroyed to preserve the life or health of the mother (Dr. Pamela Smith, Senate Hearing Record, p.82: Partial Birth Abortion Ban Medical Testimony). People like Jill Stanek have exposed a practice, in which children marked for abortion are born alive and then killed. This is exactly where the logic of partial-birth abortion leads. On November 5, 2003, President George W. Bush signed into law the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. On April 18, 2007 the Supreme Court announced its decision to uphold the ban on partial-birth abortion. The procedure in question is properly called “partial-birth abortion” because, as even secular sources acknowledge, it requires the doctor to deliver the unborn child partially from the uterus, feet first, leaving the baby’s head inside the womb. The doctor then uses scissors and a hollow needle to empty the skull of its contents. The unborn baby’s head then collapses and the doctor removes the dead baby entirely from the mother’s body. Given the nature of the procedure, the congressmen who drafted legislation to prohibit it, the “Partial-Birth Abortion Act of 1995″, defined the procedure as follows: “an abortion in which the person performing the abortion partially vaginally delivers a living fetus before killing the fetus and completing the delivery”. The doctors who perform this barbaric act and those who seek to justify it attempt to hide its nature by describing it euphemistically as “intact dilation and evacuation/extraction” or as “intrauterine cranial decompression. “Physicians Ad Hoc Coalition for Truth” (PHACT), a group of more than 300 medical specialists organized to counter the misinformation provided by the abortion industry of the United States, pointed out: “Partial-birth abortion is never medically necessary to protect the health of a woman or to protect her future fertility; in fact, the procedure can pose grave dangers to the woman”. Many people argue that the anesthetics used in the process kill the baby, so death to the child is painless. However the American Society of Anesthesiologists testified to Congress that this is simply not true. On July 11, 1995, American Medical News (AMA’s official journal) submitted the transcript of a tape-recorded interview with abortionist Dr. Martin Haskell to the House Judiciary Committee in which he admitted: “…the majority of fetuses aborted this way (partial birth abortion) are alive until the end of the procedure.” As disturbing as this sounds, these are the facts. In this country medical doctors are partially delivering babies and then killing them. These babies are inches from being born. Many could be born and placed directly in the loving arms of childless couples for adoption. Instead, they are cruelly killed.

Duration : 0:4:30

(more…)

Barack Obama Girl McCain Debate not Jib Jab video Red 1

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

Part One of The Thick Red Line - Introduction
Democratic Party War Room
Roman Griffen Review Bill Ayers Bernadine Dohrn Weather Underground New Party CAC Woods Fund Debate Jib Jab Time for some campaignin video This Land Fox News CNBC CBS ABC Interview Sarah Palin John McCain Oprah Winfrey Ellen Today Show Matt Laurer Regis BarackObama.com Late Show Barack Obama Girl Crush on Yes We Can Dear Mr. Obama My Plans for 2008 Letterman top 10 O’Reilly Factor rising sun symbol Roman Griffen Debate Convention Republican Democratic Marxist Communist Communism Socialist Socialism Marxism Saul Alinsky Frank Davis Biden Palin Debate Preview

Duration : 0:6:29

(more…)

“We The People” :90–Democratic Party Branding Animatic

Saturday, June 13th, 2009

Commonly used in advertising as a way to test messages, what follows is a model of a television commercial called an “animatic,” as conceived by Adam Klugman. Once produced, this proposed commercial would become the centerpiece of a national branding campaign for the Democratic Party in 2008 and beyond.
To see more of this campaign, including print examples and letters of endorsement from 22 Democratic State Parties, log on @ www.WeThePeople.TV

Duration : 0:4:16

(more…)

Mass. Democratic Party in Springfield

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

(WWLP) - A preview of the Massachusetts Democratic Convention in Springfield with Springfield political analyst Tony Cignoli.
http://www.wwlp.com

Duration : 0:3:5

(more…)

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) Speaks to the DNC

Saturday, June 6th, 2009

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) addresses the Democratic National Convention.

Duration : 0:6:5

(more…)

Partial-Birth Abortion - Obama Debate Comments / Partial Birth Abortion Ban Video

Friday, May 29th, 2009

Obama Partial Birth Abortion / His Televised Debate Comments

Images and text courtesy of National Right to Life. Video clip courtesy of MSNBC. Published by rosaryfilms of Secret of the Rosary Films. The pictures in the video are not fiction. The partial birth abortion is not a rare procedure. It is, essentially, a variant of the even more common and equally gruesome Dilation and Evacuation (D&E) procedure. There are in fact absolutely no obstetrical situations encountered in this country which require a partially delivered human fetus to be destroyed to preserve the life or health of the mother (Dr. Pamela Smith, Senate Hearing Record, p.82: Partial Birth Abortion Ban Medical Testimony). People like Jill Stanek have exposed a practice, in which children marked for abortion are born alive and then killed. This is exactly where the logic of partial-birth abortion leads. On November 5, 2003, President George W. Bush signed into law the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. On April 18, 2007 the Supreme Court announced its decision to uphold the ban on partial-birth abortion. The procedure in question is properly called “partial-birth abortion” because, as even secular sources acknowledge, it requires the doctor to deliver the unborn child partially from the uterus, feet first, leaving the baby’s head inside the womb. The doctor then uses scissors and a hollow needle to empty the skull of its contents. The unborn baby’s head then collapses and the doctor removes the dead baby entirely from the mother’s body. Given the nature of the procedure, the congressmen who drafted legislation to prohibit it, the “Partial-Birth Abortion Act of 1995″, defined the procedure as follows: “an abortion in which the person performing the abortion partially vaginally delivers a living fetus before killing the fetus and completing the delivery”. The doctors who perform this barbaric act and those who seek to justify it attempt to hide its nature by describing it euphemistically as “intact dilation and evacuation/extraction” or as “intrauterine cranial decompression. “Physicians Ad Hoc Coalition for Truth” (PHACT), a group of more than 300 medical specialists organized to counter the misinformation provided by the abortion industry of the United States, pointed out: “Partial-birth abortion is never medically necessary to protect the health of a woman or to protect her future fertility; in fact, the procedure can pose grave dangers to the woman”. Many people argue that the anesthetics used in the process kill the baby, so death to the child is painless. However the American Society of Anesthesiologists testified to Congress that this is simply not true. On July 11, 1995, American Medical News (AMA’s official journal) submitted the transcript of a tape-recorded interview with abortionist Dr. Martin Haskell to the House Judiciary Committee in which he admitted: “…the majority of fetuses aborted this way (partial birth abortion) are alive until the end of the procedure.” As disturbing as this sounds, these are the facts. In this country medical doctors are partially delivering babies and then killing them. These babies are inches from being born. Many could be born and placed directly in the loving arms of childless couples for adoption. Instead, they are cruelly killed.

Duration : 0:3:32

(more…)