commonsensesd.org

For the past two decades my state had generous welfare programs, so generous it attracted many poor people from Gary, Indiana and Chicago, Illinois. Many of the people that came happened to be minorities. Now all these years later the great democratic party thinkers are perplexed that we have such a high percentage of our minority population that isn’t employed compared to other states. Of course these great thinkers now believe something is discriminatory and wrong with our state! Now we’ll probably spend millions trying to figure out what’s wrong.

Is that a typical example of the insanity of the leftist/democrat mindset?

Lets give free stuff away! Hey, were did all these people come from? We need to raise taxes to help give more stuff to these people! Hey even more people? Higher taxes? Every ones welcome! Even more taxes. It’s all Bush’s fault LOL

Is it our biggest challenge ever to overcome the ignorance, selfishness, envy, and laziness of the modern democratic party supporters?

Yes, liberals are a bigger threat than islamic radicals and they are worse than the nazis were. Liberals are like a malignant cancer sucking the life from this country.

Does today’s mainstream media news still hold the reputation of society’s watchdog?

Within the last 15 years or so, a polarizing effect has occurred moving news organizations to align themselves with either democratic or republican party interests. In so doing, their reporting has been biased at best and alienated certain viewer segments for the sake of satisfying what appears to be a personal political agenda. Thus, viewers on both sides (Republican and Democrat) are left with only rhetoric and commentary to size up current events.

Gone are the days of hard hitting investigative reporting.

Take Ken Silverstein for instance who was an investigative journalist and while undercover, approached powerful Washington lobbying groups as a representative seeking support for the country of Turkmenistan, which happened to have a horrible human rights record, looking to gain favor with the United States government in seeking favorable legislation. The less than patriotic lobbyists were glad to oblige and took his money. His expose was published in Harpers magazine, which was a blockbuster as far as the readers were concerned, however spurned by other journalists because his methods were seen as – deceptive?  

Hmmm, a man from an oppressive foreign nation approaches American lobbyists with money to burn looking to gain access and favor with American politicians and the reporter is shunned by his peers for deceptive practices?

Investigative news reporting has been mitigated and repackaged to debate spun news programs with hosts and a panel of experts as opposed to on the ground fact finding. This most notably occurs within the cable news network environments, which even despite the lower percentage of viewers tuning in for news overall, have managed capture the lions share of the market overtaking local news affiliates.

Apparently the media watchdog only barks at certain crooks while others get a pass.

The average commentator or reporter is not the problem; however lies with the editors, producers, and owners of the news organizations who have compromised their professionalism for advancing political beliefs and set the tone for how and what information will be conveyed. Of course this would be denied by them, but the average Joe knows where to get his news based upon his own political direction. To support my point, chances are if you’re a democrat you’ll tune in to CNN or MSNBC, however if you’re a Republican, Fox news is probably you’re source of news. No surprises here.

The problem this creates for the average individual is that its human nature on certain levels to seek confirmation of our beliefs by like-minded individuals, which gives us a sense of acceptance within society. In so doing, we will choose that one news media outlet over the other just to confirm that we are indeed correct for thinking the way that we do. The problem then becomes cyclical in that his/her source of news information suppresses or under reports the very information that may contradict his/her political views. In so doing, you are only getting half the truth but satisfied nonetheless because your beliefs are confirmed.

It would seem that news media outlets have tossed a veil over their once bright spotlights – too much light on any given issue could be a bad thing especially if your own political underpinnings become visible.

There are possibly hundreds of political scandals taking place as you read this and for the most part are left unchecked and unchallenged by the news media. No doubt, you may likely turn the news on to find “discussions” taking place with the likes of Bill O’Reilly and Chris Matthews, however are most likely a magnified political hit job; void of any fact or investigative findings. It is apparent that news reporting agencies have left “the ground” for the safer confines enjoyed within the walls of their studios.

When we got hit on 9/11 we soon found that our intelligence was inefficient in that we relied upon satellites and computers for intelligence gathering as opposed to having feet and eyes on the ground watching our enemies. Thus, we had to quickly reconfigure and realign our methods for gathering intelligence if we were to have any chance in reducing the threats of terrorism. So too would be the case for news reporting in today’s environment in  that uncertainty is growing rampant as it relates to our economy.

The spiraling economy has piqued the emotions of many in terms of finding out “what went wrong and who is to blame” and second “what is being done about it.” The “what is being done about it” is pivotal in that it has immediate impacts in all of our lives, however is not fully being exposed but rather presented only in the grey shades of political hide and seek.

People trust their good senses and know when something isn’t fully exposed at which times survival skills and instinct prevails.

The fact that the government who has just given $350 Billion to big business, but has not delivered on its promise of transparency in who is receiving this money and why, exemplifies the weakness and inability of main stream media news to be an effective watchdog in today’s society.

We viewers create the advertising dollars through the products we purchase from their advertisers and like any organization faced with a business decision will not throw good money after bad if ratings continue to decline.

When the checks stop coming in, mainstream media news may make an honest attempt to satisfy the viewer and look out for society’s best interest, but at that point will they have lost all credibility and simply be regarded as political mouthpieces?

Any move to the center by a news organization would undoubtedly be a painful process. It would involve a blind eye to ones political dogma and the courage to ask some tough questions to some tough people. However, the payoff would be a dominant viewer market share knowing that the majority of the US population is comprised of honest and hard working Americans who always cheers for the good guy especially when they catch the crook red-handed.

Reporter: “Senator, why are you supporting A when you campaigned on B – this is very odd? Why are you voting against your constituents wishes? Have you been compromised? Do you stand to personally gain from this? Is money involved?”

Senator: ”Um ….no comment”

Reporter: “That’s the news folks, goodnight.”

Eric Kaad
http://www.articlesbase.com/politics-articles/media-bias-affects-both-the-left-and-right-704057.html

Hillary Clinton’s appointment as Secretary of State will afford many future opportunities to compare her performance with her predecessor Condoleezza Rice in bringing finality to the allocation of sovereignty in the West Bank and Gaza - where no internationally recognised sovereign ruler has reigned supreme since Britain left in haste in 1948 with its lion‘s tale firmly planted between its legs.

To be fair to Ms Rice her failure to resolve the status of the West Bank and Gaza was due to the flawed objectives of President Bush’s 2003 Roadmap - popularly termed the “two state solution”.

President Bush misguidedly envisioned the Palestinian Arabs accepting a democratic, contiguous, viable - - and 22nd Arab Moslem - state in the major part of the West Bank and Gaza between Jordan, Egypt and Israel - living in peace and harmony alongside an expanded Jewish State whose boundaries would incorporate a substantial majority of the 200000 Jews then living in the West Bank and Gaza.

President Bush also believed the Arabs would abandon their 70 years old demand for millions of Arabs to be granted permission to emigrate to Israel - opting instead to engage in the business of nation building in their own newly created state in the West Bank and Gaza.

Not only he genuinely believed this laudable and idealistic goal was achievable. The President was able to convince the European Union, Russia and the United Nations to join him in negotiating such an outcome.

He - and they - have been proved sorely wrong on all counts.

Ms Rice became the most frequent - and frustrated - foreign emissary to the region since the Roadmap’s formulation yet failed to achieve even the slightest change in the Arabs’ negotiating stance - first formulated in 1967 - which totally rejected the President’s vision and its desired result.

Israel had been prepared to make concessions in settling its claims in the West Bank and Gaza in accordance with the rights accruing to the Jewish people under Article 80 of the United Nations Charter. However in the face of entrenched Arab opposition to recognising any Jewish claims of any sort whatsoever in the West Bank and Gaza those concessions were always bound to be rejected.

President Bush’s belief that he could solve the Arab - Jewish conflict has come crashing to the ground joining the failed attempts of President Carter and President Clinton - who also thought they too had the power prestige and standing to do exactly the same.

Now President-elect Obama stands ready to follow in their footsteps. He needs to be very careful in believing he has the answers to finally end the Arab -Jewish conflict where distinguished former Presidents - and even the League of Nations and United Nations before them - have failed so abysmally.

Unverified reports that President-elect Obama intends to pursue President Bush’s two-state solution or perhaps even embrace the 2002 Arab League Peace Initiative will inevitably land him in the same cavernous potholes that President Bush - and those who resolutely accompanied him - encountered in their six year trip to nowhere.

The Arab League Initiative is a sugar coated pill that merely repeats the 40 years old Arab demands that have caused the Roadmap to be taken off the best seller list. Put to the Jewish people as a “take it or leave it” proposal the Initiative will be rejected - as no major political party in Israel could possibly embrace its terms unconditionally and hope to gain Government when the next elections are held in February 2009.

Peace between Jews and Arabs will not be achieved in one trip. There will need to be frequent garage stops to refuel the vehicle and even a few oil and grease changes. It is a very long journey that will require patient and very careful navigation around all kinds of obstacles and pot holes.

The overly-ambitious objective of totally solving the conflict should now give way to genuine attempts to manage and moderate the conflict - rather than bring it to a triumphant and permanent end - since Jews and Arabs remain as far apart as they were when the division of Palestine was first proposed between them by the Peel Commission in 1937.

President-elect Obama needs to prepare for his journey armed with the Congressional Resolution dated 21 September 1922 (42 Stat. 1012 PART 1, 1922) signed by the 29th President Warren G. Harding which stated:

“Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled THAT the United States of America favours the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of Christian and all other non-Jewish communities in Palestine, and that the holy places and religious buildings and sites in Palestine shall be adequately protected.”

The President-elect should unequivocally affirm his support for this resolution and its clear intent.

He needs to understand where the territorial boundaries of “Palestine” were located in 1922 and what has since happened to the allocation of sovereignty between Arabs and Jews in the length and breadth of that territory.

He has to recognise that the Jews now exercise sovereignty in 17% of Palestine, the Arabs exercise sovereignty in 77% of Palestine and that sovereignty remains unallocated between either Jews or Arabs in the remaining 6% now called the West Bank and Gaza..

He must appreciate that the history of Palestine did not start in 1948, that it was part of the territorial division of the Ottoman Empire after the defeat of Turkey in World War 1 - offering the Arab nation self determination in 99.99% of that liberated land and the Jewish people self determination in just 0.01% of such land.

He must acknowledge the body of international law that exists in relation to Palestine - starting with the Treaty of Sevres in 1920 - which the Arabs now need to finally accept since continuing rejection prevents any possible prospect of a peaceful resolution of the Arab-Jewish conflict.

Armed with this body of information President-elect Obama will understand why President Bush’s two state solution and the Arab League Initiative never did, never could, and never will succeed. He should be able to conclude that changes in the Arab negotiating stance are necessary since pressing for 100% of your demands can never lead to a concluded agreement with your adversary.

President-elect Obama must carefully plan for the journey that awaits him before he turns the engine on.

david singer
http://www.articlesbase.com/politics-articles/palestine-and-obama-ego-trip-or-meaningful-journey-673576.html

It all started November 21st, to be exact. But by Wednesday and Friday of the week before last the market again saw institutions starting to buy shares of beaten down stocks by way of follow-through action, and we noted some solid action among breakout stocks.

Now, we’ve seen fizzled rallies before during the recent downturn, so before we break out the party favors, let’s realize that a substantial, unfavorable news story or two could destroy all the glad tidings.

But the simple fact that the market rallied despite a horrid employment report indicating that 533,000 jobs were lost– 1.3 million lost in the last 3 months– indicates that the market is looking beyond the current headlines to potentially better times.

It almost seems as though the naysayers have beaten the same drum for so long, that the market is rallying on anything even remotely suggesting better times.

Still unsure? So are we. But consider this. We’ve seen unprecedentedly awful employment numbers, woeful consumer spending, plunging consumer confidence, contracting manufacturing and fears– no, likelihood– of a global recession, and still, here we are with a market that’s following through.

Let’s take a closer look at the “glass half full” part of the equation. We have the prospect of breakthrough negotiations in handing the “big 3″ automakers their badly needed infusion, a democratic party-conceived stimulus package shortly after Obama enters the White House in January, drastically declining oil prices, interest rates near zero, and companies for whom the earnings bar has been set so low that they almost can’t help but exceed expectations.

Perhaps one of the most telling harbingers of better things to come is the action of leading stocks, which, one by one are starting to set up in double bottoms, cup and handle patterns and such. Leading stocks are the proverbial canaries in the coal mine. They’re typically the first stocks out of the chute when conditions start to improve. You’ve doubtless heard the old saw that the market tends to “climb a wall of worry.” Well maybe. Just maybe, that’s starting to happen.

Already, we’ve seen several stocks break out, and hold onto their gains. There are more lining up as we speak. Continued action along these same lines will tell us if the current rally has any staying power, so pay attention! Don’t expect the market to give you any more by way of a “sneak preview” before it starts moving up again.

Paul Johnson
http://www.articlesbase.com/investing-articles/some-signs-indicate-improving-stock-market-conditions-690047.html

All the Democrats in congress are Felons just haven’t been convicted and neither has he so is the democratic party racist?
Are they suddenly racist, is he to dark, should he claim one of his parents is white then it would be alright to rig the election.

because they are racists

According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, bailing out America’s Big Three automakers should not be considered “as life-support to sustain a dying industry, but a jump start for an industry that is essential to our country’s economic health.” Really, Madam Speaker? America, let’s face it, the proposed bailout isn’t about rescuing GM, it’s about preserving the UAW, its toxic contracts, and its political ties with the Democratic Party. A bailout of the Big Three is a mistake of monumental proportions as it subsidizes a failed business model and supports continued mismanagement. Jack Kemp, former United States Representative and founder and co-director of Empower America, a public policy and advocacy organization, stated it best:

“If you tax something, you get less of it. If you subsidize something, you get more of it. The problem in America today is that we are taxing work, saving, investment, and productivity; and we’re subsidizing debt, welfare, consumption, leisure, and mediocrity.”

According to conservative industry estimates, GM alone is bleeding $1 billion of cash per month. If you give GM a $10 billion lifeline, they’ll burn through it in 10 months! 

A bailout clearly is not the answer. GM’s primary foreign rivals (BMW, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Nissan, and Toyota) all build vehicles in the USA using American labor. The key difference is they maintain leaner and more adaptable organizational structures than GM, and can perform the same operations better, faster, and with fewer resources. In the current business environment of global competition, rapid technological change, and uncertainty, this is unacceptable. GM’s multi-layered, bureaucratic organizational structure is crippling its ability to compete effectively in a global marketplace.

If a bailout is not the answer, what can GM do?

o GMAC must stop originating, securitizing, and servicing insurance and mortgage products and focus on automotive financing.

GMAC lost $2.3 billion in 2007; unfortunately, it will be difficult for GM to force any changes at GMAC. (Cerberus acquired a controlling 51% stake in 2006.) In order to return GMAC to profitability, the subsidiary must reduce exposure to the foreclosed assets, impaired loans, loan commitments, and reserve requirements inherent in their insurance and mortgage product portfolio. The business of GMAC is borrowing and lending money, and that’s not GM’s business.

o Alternatively, GM could swap a portion of its remaining 49% equity stake in GMAC to Cerberus for ownership of Chrysler. 

According to its 2007 Form 10-K, GM has 184 directly or indirectly owned subsidiaries. As a result, there’s plenty of room for asset sales and internal consolidations to generate cash and to enhance operational efficiencies. Ownership of Chrysler would enable additional asset sales and consolidations beyond what GM already can do on its own. In particular, GM and Chrysler can consolidate or dispose of assembly plants, automotive retailers, brands, duplicative corporate assets, employees and layers of management, and parts suppliers. For instance, the All-American Chevrolet and Dodge brands can be merged, as can the iconic Hummer and Jeep brands. The Chrysler nameplate can be sold to generate cash, as can Global Electric Motors. GM can swap Mopar to Delphi for forgiveness of GM’s remaining financial (including pension) and other obligations and expedite Delphi’s emergence from bankruptcy. Finally, Chrysler Financial can either be left with Cerberus or sold after the swap.

Not only is GMAC not as critical to GM’s operations as it once was, “GMAC’s business requires substantial capital”1 GM doesn’t have and cannot get. Additionally, it draws management attention away from the firm’s core operations and its reason for existence. This is something Sears discovered long ago, leading to their decision in late 1992 to divest their capital intensive non-core financial services network (i.e., Allstate, Coldwell Banker, and Dean Witter/Discover.)  Please refer to Outsourcing the American Dream by Christopher M. England for additional information related to Sears’ failed venture into retail financial services.

1General Motors Corp 2007 Form 10-K

o GM must invest heavily in intellectual property and research and development.  

In my July 2008 article, “Rescue the American Dream from the Tyranny of Foreign Oil,” I outlined several initiatives that are essential to the survival of America’s Big Three automakers, including investments in breakthrough automotive technologies and commercially-viable alternative-fuel sources. For example, GM can drive up Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) thresholds in a couple of ways. One is by substituting the same lighter-weight carbon-fiber composite body panels used by our military for steel. Another is by harnessing kinetic energy from the natural motion, rotation, and vibration of the vehicle and its parts as a supplemental power source. GM also must replace current “flex-fuel” (a.k.a. E85) vehicles with “multi flex-fuel” vehicles capable of using any pure or blended fuel source. Alternative-fuel sources can include ammonia, bio-diesel/bio-fuels, compressed natural gas, gas/electric hybrids, plug-in electrics, etc.

While hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, most of it remains locked up in more complex compounds such as ammonia, methane (natural gas or propane), or water. Not only does it require tremendous amounts of energy to separate the hydrogen from its natural compounds, it requires tremendous amounts of energy to liquefy and condense hydrogen; however, scientists are experimenting with electrolyzers, genetically-engineered bacteria, and various reactive metals that might one day lead to an abundant alternative-fuel source. According to Kevin Mayhood in a June 30, 2008 article in The Columbus Dispatch, Gerardine Botte, director of Ohio University’s Electrochemical Engineering Research Laboratory, is working on a method to pull hydrogen from the ammonia in animal and human urine. This is important for several reasons. First, we already have the infrastructure in place to distribute ammonia to retail gas station pumps, as it’s been used to make fertilizer for decades. Second, separating hydrogen from ammonia does not produce “greenhouse gases” as long as the required electricity comes from a source which produces no greenhouse gases. (The same can be said for gas/electric hybrids and plug-in electrics.) Third, ammonia is more easily liquefied and condensed than hydrogen.

o GM should consider Chapter 11.

Filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code should present GM with an enhanced opportunity to restructure its business model and dump its burdensome union agreements. GM can enter and re-emerge from Chapter 11 without enormous job losses, something the UAW and the pro-bailout Democrats chose to ignore. We’re not talking about Chapter 7 here. We’re talking about an opportunity to reign in the massive healthcare, pension, and other legacy costs that are draining GM of value and leaving it at a competitive disadvantage. Chapter 11 should be considered even if it means freezing defined benefit pension funds to new employee participation, beefing up 401(k) plans, and increasing cost sharing with employees and retirees. If GM leaves legacy costs untouched, employees and retirees ultimately will be the ones who suffer. That being said, GM also must redesign performance management and reward systems to ensure workers are compensated in the most appropriate ways. Despite suffering a net loss of $38.7 billion in 2007, Richard Wagoner, Jr., Chairman and CEO of GM, earned $15.7 million in total compensation. Something’s definitely wrong with this picture. 

 

If a bailout is not the answer, what can the Federal Government do?

o Put an end to America’s unilateral free-trade policies.

We should practice free-trade only with nations who practice it with us. Why do we allow Japan full access to the American economy, when Japan puts up barriers to American ownership of Japanese corporations or restricts the number of automobiles GM or Ford can sell in Japan? If Japan puts up barriers, we need to do the same. If China implements a 25% import tariff making our automobiles more expensive in Chinese markets, we need to do the same making Chinese automobiles more expensive in American markets. This isn’t protectionism; it’s good economic sense. 

o Rescue the American Dream from the Tyranny of Foreign Oil

In my July 2008 article, “Rescue the American Dream from the Tyranny of Foreign Oil,” I not only outlined several initiatives that are essential to the survival of America’s Big Three automakers, I also outlined numerous initiatives we must undertake to simultaneously diversify sources of oil supplies, dramatically slash oil consumption, and increase production of alternative-energy sources to clean up the environment, increase our energy efficiency, protect national security interests, reduce the military and political leverage of OPEC oil, revitalize the U.S. economy, and shrink trade deficits.

www.christophermengland.com

 

Christopher M. England
http://www.articlesbase.com/politics-articles/rescuing-gm-690521.html

Seemingly, progressives have taken over the democratic party and the libertarians and the Tea Party have taken over the republican party.

No.

  

 

 ?Dr. Jekyll  Mr. Hyde      

 

Bernard Lawrence Madoff born April 29, 1938 is an American businessman and former Chairman of the Nasdaq stock market. He started the Wall Street firm Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC in 1960 and was its chairman until December 11, 2008, when he was arrested and charged with securities fraud.

Madoff was a philanthrop. He donated vast amounts of money during his whole life to charitable organizations, hospitals, theatersand to the Democratic Party.  He was chairman at the Yeshiva University, member of board of New York City 

 

His sons were those who turned him in after confronting him. He confirmed that he was unable to pay back investors who wished to withdraw their money due to the global

 

  financial crisis. 

 

Being a numerologist also, I always make the person’s numerological chart. This gives me a clear-cut picture, here the hour of birth is irrelevant.

Since every number has its ruling planet, from the numerological chart I can see which planets will be the most important in the astrological map.

From the birth date the most important planets are : Moon (2), Uranus(4), Neptune(7) and Mars(9).

From his name : Bernard Lawrence Madoff the ruler of the name is Neptune.

 

Terribly interesting that the total of the birthday is 27, and the total of the name is 27.

 

This means that the person is in balance.

 

It also gives the no. 7 cycle year most important.

 

7 is ruled by Neptune.

 

He is 70 years old now.

 

He is in his 7th year. !!

 

Neptune means fraud, smoggy surroundings, cover=ups. You know….

 

Now looking at his astrological sunrise map at 5.49

 

I get Tau. Asc. Sun conj Uranus in the first.( eccentric personality ? )

 

2-8 house Gemini-Sag. In the 2nd with Chiron in Yod to the North Node  With the Moon from the 12th

 

8th ruler, Jupiter others’ money is in the 10th

 

I said the most important planet was Neptune, and there it is! In the 5thH of gambling ( behind the curtains) with only one aspect- a very large one to the Sun !

 

Let us not forget he donated vast amounts of money= MC in Aqua.

 

But Jupiter is in 150 deg to Pluto !

 

His sons gave him in: Mercury- ruler of 5th in the 12th . His sons worked with him, but did not know anything about the pyramid system he built up during the last years.

 

If I check the point of age, he is now 70, exactly on the Moon!

For the future I use directed charts 1 deg/year.

In this chart we can see Neptune in opposition to Venus in an exact angle! Neptune is in the 7th (house of open enemies) on his North Node. symbolizing a very karmic event.

 

Directed Jupiter conjunct his Natal Sun. Jupiter is not always the “great benefactor” it can also bring disasters and collapses. On his day of arrest, Jupiter squared the South Node in the directed chart, from the 4th house, another sign of an “inside job”, meaning, the sons turned him in. Was this a ” deja vu?” could we have foreseen this in his natal chart?

 

Mercury conjunct his Moon in the 12, the house of undoing, of secrets and jail..? in disharmonic angle to Natal North Node in the 7th house, house of open enemies or partners. His sons were his co-workers, but it turned out to be a very difficult relationship.

 

Could they have NOT known what was going on? It’s difficult to believe, with the square between the MC and Mercury. Or did he take the blame for everyone involved?? Ruler of ascendant in the sunrise chart is Venus.

 

On the arrest day Venus is trine Transiting Mars ( ruler of the 12th )

 

Uranus on Natal Pluto sudden, total and karmic fall. More details will be received when Uranus will trine Directed Neptune.

Pluto 150 to natal Sun from the 6th house of work, well he resigned from all his memberships and chairmanships. Directed Pluto is in exact trine to Directed North node in the 10th house of fame. Indeed this bad pyramid-system made him more famous then he has ever been.

The transit chart for the 11th is also gloomy;

 

Following the key planets as explained above: Moon, Uranus, Neptune and Mars.

Transiting moon is in the 1st house on his Mars. Transiting Uranus is in opposition to natal Neptune, in houses 5-11… investments, gambling to large organizations. Uranus indeed brought the fatal collapse. This thing was going on for some while… Look at Saturn! it had just passed Neptune. Some say things happen after exact effect of an angle.

 

Transiting Mars from the 8th,is squaring Natal Neptune!!

I am sure many of you will be able to find many more clues as to the collapse. Fixed stars positions, midpoints, asteroids, etc. But the picture is clear.

Looking into the future, based on numerology, more hardships on their way under the severe Saturn, that will rule till his upcoming birthday in April 09.

 If you do what you should not, you must bear what you would not-

 

                                                                                 Benjamin Franklin

Gabriella Mittelman
http://www.articlesbase.com/astrology-articles/bernard-lawrence-madoff-the-collapse-692776.html

Once again, the Maoists continue to censor free speech report abuse on this question. I wish that liberals could restrain themselves. This just proves another point.

The Democratic party and Communist party thrive on class warfare, huge government that interferes with individual liberty, and government dependence. If Democrats don’t want to be compared, why do they allow themselves and their party to act like them?
Once again, we can see the power-hungry liberals can’t dispute the facts that they and their party act similar to communists.

Both parties are very close in their ideals and if given the chance the democrats,libs, progressives would be seen by other countries as being Communist in nature.

The differences: The democratic party hides under the name democrat in an effort to gain more people to it’s side and avoid being thrown out of the US.. The communist party doesn’t do that.